Skip to main content

Digital invoice processing and automation is leaving OCR behind

by Anna Tujunen
Chief Product Officer, Dooap
September 27 2017

Manual invoice processing is no doubt one of the leading pain points in accounts payable. AP professionals are eager to implement automation solutions that can cut down on tedious data entry and time spent on menial invoicing tasks.

According to a study from iPayables, long approval and payment processes and paper invoicing accounted for 40 percent of the leading frustrations faced by AP professionals today. Nearly 100 percent of study respondents expressed that the solution is AP automation technology.

Paper-based, manual processing is a huge issue and providers have been trying to find alternative solutions for years.

Optical Character Recognition, or OCR, was essentially the beginning of invoice automation, with the goal of improving efficiency. It was a really good start, but OCR won't hold up in the future. As the adoption of truly digital e-invoicing advances rapidly, the true benefits of invoice automation are realized, and they don't include OCR.

Why is OCR not sufficient? In reality, it's not foolproof, leaving a substantial gap that requires manual review and input. For one-off transactions and infrequent purchases, it's not accurate, and improving accuracy takes more time and money to set up than it would to process the invoice manually. With today's capabilities, it would be a bigger benefit for a company to have smart software that uses the digital transfer of vendor invoices to the buyer to maintain a consistent and accurate record of activity.

Teaching suppliers and employees to use OCR takes up a lot of resources and time. On top of that, OCR is only a band-aid solution to remedy the issue of paper-based invoice processing, but doesn't do much to solve it. Today's AP ...

FREE Membership Required to View Full Content:

Joining gives you free, unlimited access to news, analysis, white papers, case studies, product brochures, and more. You can also receive periodic email newsletters with the latest relevant articles and content updates.
Learn more about us here

About Anna Tujunen

Dooap's Chief Product Officer, Anna Tujunen, is a former controller now developing software "from an AP professional to an AP professional". She is also a member of the E-Invoicing workgroup of the US Federal Reserve's Business Payments Coalition. This well-versed AP guru loves traveling and music quizzes.

More about Anna Tujunen
Submitted by rmonio on Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:25 Permalink

I firmly disagree with the premise the guest writer has concerning OCR. While it is true that traditional OCR costs have encouraged only those companies who had the CAPEX monies to invest, the advent of the Cloud and true Capture-as-a-Service (CaaS) integrated systems have drastically changed the market opportunity available to all who wish to use OCR as part of the AP process. Paper has not gone away and e-invoicing is still a process underway - companies need immediate savings contributions and CaaS brings this forward. Together with ERP platforms that are increasing building AP functions necessary to deliver approval, matching, and other items necessary, I would advocate that the relevance of solid capture solutions have increased to the point where once again they play a solid role in the success of a companies’ Accounts Payable efforts. Also - a comment about the “error-prone” OCR comment. While it is true that systems that require a customer to continually “train” their OCR solution to recognize new and diverse incoming supplier invoice formations causes issues and cost, CaaS systems leveraging multi-tenant learning engines achieve initial capture rates that totally refute the point that was made. More insight into these developments should be looked at before making this broad-based assumption and cost commentary. ISVs and Integrators today who want to be successful have to recognize that the Cloud has changed the paradigms of how Accounts payable processing will occur in a customer’s environment. CaaS is one of those topics that needs to be investigated and it’s benefits leveraged as part of their practices and solutions.

In reply to by anonymous_stub (not verified)

Submitted by Dooap on Fri, 10/06/2017 - 19:16 Permalink

From Anna Tujunen: I wholeheartedly agree that the “capture as a service” is the way to go, even up to the point you have still one invoice a month as a paper invoice. What I don’t believe is that companies themselves spend time validating the capturing results OR teaching the software’s to learn OR are modeling multiple different vendor templates. In-house scanning is the devil here. With In-house scanning, I have seen many failed projects where you end up spending the same time “teaching” the software and correcting mistakes as you did before keying in the values. With a scanning service, I do not see the same failures as you are outsourcing the whole process. In the end, why would I even care what the technology behind the service is, as long as I get my invoices digitalized correctly and with the most affordable price possible? It could be OCR it could be something even different. In the long run, a company that now has 100% of paper/pdf invoices (which they scan or key-in in-house) would have over 90% in a matter of a year or two. I today visited a company with 95+% of eInvoices so it can happen! Let me know if you have any other questions here.