Digital invoice processing and automation is leaving OCR behind

September 27 2017

Manual invoice processing is no doubt one of the leading pain points in accounts payable. AP professionals are eager to implement automation solutions that can cut down on tedious data entry and time spent on menial invoicing tasks.

About Anna Tujunen

Dooap's Chief Product Officer, Anna Tujunen, is a former controller now developing software "from an AP professional to an AP professional". She is also a member of the E-Invoicing workgroup of the US Federal Reserve's Business Payments Coalition. This well-versed AP guru loves traveling and music quizzes.

More about Anna Tujunen


rmonio's picture

I firmly disagree with the premise the guest writer has concerning OCR. While it is true that traditional OCR costs have encouraged only those companies who had the CAPEX monies to invest, the advent of the Cloud and true Capture-as-a-Service (CaaS) integrated systems have drastically changed the market opportunity available to all who wish to use OCR as part of the AP process. Paper has not gone away and e-invoicing is still a process underway - companies need immediate savings contributions and CaaS brings this forward. Together with ERP platforms that are increasing building AP functions necessary to deliver approval, matching, and other items necessary, I would advocate that the relevance of solid capture solutions have increased to the point where once again they play a solid role in the success of a companies’ Accounts Payable efforts. Also - a comment about the “error-prone” OCR comment. While it is true that systems that require a customer to continually “train” their OCR solution to recognize new and diverse incoming supplier invoice formations causes issues and cost, CaaS systems leveraging multi-tenant learning engines achieve initial capture rates that totally refute the point that was made. More insight into these developments should be looked at before making this broad-based assumption and cost commentary. ISVs and Integrators today who want to be successful have to recognize that the Cloud has changed the paradigms of how Accounts payable processing will occur in a customer’s environment. CaaS is one of those topics that needs to be investigated and it’s benefits leveraged as part of their practices and solutions.

Dooap's picture

From Anna Tujunen: I wholeheartedly agree that the “capture as a service” is the way to go, even up to the point you have still one invoice a month as a paper invoice. What I don’t believe is that companies themselves spend time validating the capturing results OR teaching the software’s to learn OR are modeling multiple different vendor templates. In-house scanning is the devil here. With In-house scanning, I have seen many failed projects where you end up spending the same time “teaching” the software and correcting mistakes as you did before keying in the values. With a scanning service, I do not see the same failures as you are outsourcing the whole process. In the end, why would I even care what the technology behind the service is, as long as I get my invoices digitalized correctly and with the most affordable price possible? It could be OCR it could be something even different. In the long run, a company that now has 100% of paper/pdf invoices (which they scan or key-in in-house) would have over 90% in a matter of a year or two. I today visited a company with 95+% of eInvoices so it can happen! Let me know if you have any other questions here.